Comparison of the PCPLC Database to NSQIP-P: A Patient Matched Comparison of Surgical Complications Following Repair of Anorectal Malformation.

BACKGROUND: Anorectal malformations (ARM) are rare and heterogenous which creates a challenge in conducting research and offering recommendations for best practice. The Pediatric Colorectal and Pelvic Learning Consortium (PCPLC) was formed in 2016 to address this challenge and created a shared national data registry to collect information about pediatric colorectal patients. There has been no external validation of the data collected. We sought to evaluate the database by performing a patient matched analysis comparing 30-day outcomes identified in the PCPLC registry with the NSQIP-P database for patients undergoing surgical repair of ARM. METHODS: Patients captured in the PCPLC database from 2016 to 2021 at institutions also participating in NSQIP-P who underwent ARM repair younger than 12 months old were reviewed for 30-day complications. These patients were matched to their NSQIP-P record using their hospital identification number, and records were compared for concordance in identified complications. RESULTS: A total of 591 patient records met inclusion criteria in the PCPLC database. Of these, 180 patients were also reviewed by NSQIP-P. One hundred and fifty-six patient records had no complications recorded. Twenty-four patient records had a complication listed in one or both databases. There was a 91 % concordance rate between databases. When excluding complications not tracked in the PCPLC registry, this agreement improved to 93 %. CONCLUSION: Including all patients evaluated for this subpopulation, a 91 % concordance rate was observed when comparing PCPLC collected complications to NSQIP-P. Future efforts can focus on further validating the data within the PCPLC for other patient populations. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: V.

Outcomes From Colonic Pull-Through for Cloacal Exstrophy Differ by Colon Length: A Multi-Institutional Study.

BACKGROUND: Cloacal exstrophy (CE) represents a rare sub-group of anorectal malformations. Traditionally managed with a permanent colostomy, colonic pull-through (PT) has emerged to allow cleanliness without a life-long stoma. We sought to understand outcomes of PT in a large multi-center CE population. METHODS: We performed a retrospective study involving eleven pediatric hospitals. We gathered data on demographics, outcomes, and anatomical factors including colon length. Continuous variables were analyzed with Wilcoxon rank-sum tests and categorial variables with Fisher's exact tests. RESULTS: There were 98 patients, of which the majority (n = 70, 71.4 %) never underwent PT. There were no differences in exstrophy type, demographics, or associated anomalies. Median age at PT was 1.3 years (IQR 0.3-3.7). Of the cohort that continue to use their PT, the majority (n = 16, 69.6 %) are not clean. In total, 7.1 % (n = 7) of the cohort is clean with a PT, and only one patient is continent. Clean patients have a longer colon length than those who are not clean or opt for re-do ostomy (64.0 cm [IQR 46.0-82.0] vs 26.5 cm [IQR 11.6-41.2], p = 0.005). CONCLUSION: Overall, we demonstrate that most children born with CE will keep their stoma. Only a small percentage who elect to undergo colonic PT are clean for stool. Greater colon length correlates with success. This suggests that multiple factors, including colon length, are important when considering PT in a child with CE. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Rectal Prolapse Following Repair of Anorectal Malformation: Incidence, Risk Factors, and Management.

BACKGROUND: The incidence and optimal management of rectal prolapse following repair of an anorectal malformation (ARM) has not been well-defined. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was performed utilizing data from the Pediatric Colorectal and Pelvic Learning Consortium registry. All children with a history of ARM repair were included. Our primary outcome was rectal prolapse. Secondary outcomes included operative management of prolapse and anoplasty stricture following operative management of prolapse. Univariate analyses were performed to identify patient factors associated with our primary and secondary outcomes. A multivariable logistic regression was developed to assess the association between laparoscopic ARM repair and rectal prolapse. RESULTS: A total of 1140 patients met inclusion criteria; 163 (14.3%) developed rectal prolapse. On univariate analysis, prolapse was significantly associated with male sex, sacral abnormalities, ARM type, ARM complexity, and laparoscopic ARM repairs (p < 0.001). ARM types with the highest rates of prolapse included rectourethral-prostatic fistula (29.2%), rectovesical/bladder neck fistula (28.8%), and cloaca (25.0%). Of those who developed prolapse, 110 (67.5%) underwent operative management. Anoplasty strictures developed in 27 (24.5%) patients after prolapse repair. After controlling for ARM type and hospital, laparoscopic ARM repair was not significantly associated with prolapse (adjusted odds ratio (95% CI): 1.50 (0.84, 2.66), p = 0.17). CONCLUSION: Rectal prolapse develops in a significant subset of patients following ARM repair. Risk factors for prolapse include male sex, complex ARM type, and sacral abnormalities. Further research investigating the indications for operative management of prolapse and operative techniques for prolapse repair are needed to define optimal treatment. TYPE OF STUDY: Retrospective cohort study. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II.

Multi-Institutional Review From the Pediatric Colorectal and Pelvic Learning Consortium of Minor Spinal Cord Dysraphism in the Setting of Anorectal Malformations: Diagnosis, Treatment, and Outcomes.

BACKGROUND/RATIONALE: Anorectal malformations (ARM) are associated with congenital anomalies of the spine, but the impact of a minor spinal cord dysraphism (mSCD) on fecal continence in the setting of ARM remains unclear. MATERIALS/METHODS: A retrospective review was performed utilizing data from the Pediatric Colorectal and Pelvic Learning Consortium (PCPLC) registry. The patient cohort was reviewed for ARM type, mSCD screening/incidence/neurosurgical intervention and age-based BMP utilization. RESULTS: 987 patients with ARM were categorized into mild (38%), moderate (32%) or complex (19%). 694 (70%) had normal spinal (NS) status. 271 (27.5%) patients had mSCD. MRI alone (49%) was the most common screening test for mSCD. US screening had a positive predictive value of 86.3% and a negative predictive value of 67.1%. Surgical intervention rates for mSCD ranged between 13% and 77% at a median age of 0.6-5.2 years. 726 (73.6%) patients were prescribed BMP (74.4% NS, 77.5% mSCD). Laxatives were most utilized BMP in all groups <5yo. ≥5yo, enema utilization increased with ARM complexity independent of spine status (with or without neurosurgical intervention). Neurosurgical intervention did not affect BMP utilization at any age or with any ARM when mSCD was identified. CONCLUSIONS: MSCD influence on bowel function in the setting ARM remains unclear. No significant impact of mSCD was noted on ARM patient bowel management program utilization. Variability exists within PCPLC site with screening and intervention for mSCD in patients with ARM. Future studies with standardized care may be needed to elucidate the true impact of mSCD on long term patient outcomes in ARM patients. TYPE OF STUDY: Retrospective Comparative Study. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Fecal continence outcomes and potential disparities for patients with anorectal malformations treated at referral institutions for pediatric colorectal surgery.

PURPOSE: Fecal incontinence is a problem for many patients born with an anorectal malformation (ARM) that can impact quality of life. It is unknown if racial, ethnic, and socioeconomic disparities relate to fecal continence in these children. We sought to examine outcomes and potential disparities in care. METHODS: We performed a multicenter retrospective study of children > 3y with ARM evaluated at sites participating in the Pediatric Colorectal and Pelvic Learning Consortium (PCPLC). The primary outcome was fecal continence. We evaluated for associations between fecal continence and race, sex, age, and insurance status. RESULTS: 509 patients with ARM from 11 institutions were included. Overall, 24% reported complete fecal continence, and fecal continence was associated with older age (p < .001). For school-aged children, 27% reported complete continence, while 53% reported none. On univariate analysis, patients with combined private and public insurance showed lower rates of continence when compared to those with private insurance (23 vs. 12%; p = 0.02). Age was associated with continence on univariate and multivariable analyses. CONCLUSION: Rates of complete fecal continence in this population are low. Differences based on payor status may exist. There were no observed disparities related to sex and race. Further investigation is warranted to improve care for this patient population. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III. TYPE OF STUDY: Multi-institutional retrospective comparative study.

Hirschsprung-associated inflammatory bowel disease: A multicenter study from the APSA Hirschsprung disease interest group.

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: A small number of Hirschsprung disease (HD) patients develop inflammatory bowel disease (IBD)-like symptoms after pullthrough surgery. The etiology and pathophysiology of Hirschsprung-associated IBD (HD-IBD) remains unknown. This study aims to further characterize HD-IBD, to identify potential risk factors and to evaluate response to treatment in a large group of patients. METHODS: Retrospective study of patients diagnosed with IBD after pullthrough surgery between 2000 and 2021 at 17 institutions. Data regarding clinical presentation and course of HD and IBD were reviewed. Effectiveness of medical therapy for IBD was recorded using a Likert scale. RESULTS: There were 55 patients (78% male). 50% (n = 28) had long segment disease. Hirschsprung-associated enterocolitis (HAEC) was reported in 68% (n = 36). Ten patients (18%) had Trisomy 21. IBD was diagnosed after age 5 in 63% (n = 34). IBD presentation consisted of colonic or small bowel inflammation resembling IBD in 69% (n = 38), unexplained or persistent fistula in 18% (n = 10) and unexplained HAEC >5 years old or unresponsive to standard treatment in 13% (n = 7). Biological agents were the most effective (80%) medications. A third of patients required a surgical procedure for IBD. CONCLUSION: More than half of the patients were diagnosed with HD-IBD after 5 years old. Long segment disease, HAEC after pull through operation and trisomy 21 may represent risk factors for this condition. Investigation for possible IBD should be considered in children with unexplained fistulae, HAEC beyond the age of 5 or unresponsive to standard therapy, and symptoms suggestive of IBD. Biological agents were the most effective medical treatment. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 4.

Does presence of a VACTERL anomaly predict an associated gynecologic anomaly in females with anorectal malformations?: A Pediatric Colorectal and Pelvic Learning Consortium Study.

BACKGROUND: VACTERL association is defined by the presence of 3 or more anomalies in any of the following systems: vertebral, anorectal, cardiac, trachea-esophageal, renal, or limb. This study hypothesized that the presence of VACTERL association would correlate with an increased risk of gynecologic anomalies in patients with anorectal malformation (ARM). METHODS: This study is a cross-sectional, retrospective analysis from the prospectively collected, multicenter registry of the Pediatric Colorectal and Pelvic Learning Consortium (PCPLC). The 834 female patients with ARM who were enrolled in the registry by January 1, 2020 were included in this study. The relationship of VACTERL association with presence of a gynecologic anomaly was evaluated with Fisher's exact test. The relationship of each VACTERL system with presence of a gynecologic anomaly was assessed in patients with cloaca, rectovestibular fistulas and rectoperineal fistulas. P-values reported were based on a 2-sided alternative and considered significant when less than 0.05. RESULTS: 834 patients with ARM underwent VACTERL screening and gynecologic evaluation with the three most common subtypes being cloaca (n = 215, 25.8%), rectovestibular fistula (n = 191, 22.9%) and rectoperineal fistula (n = 194, 23.3%). A total of 223 (26.7%) patients with ARM had gynecologic anomalies. VACTERL association was seen in 380 (45.6%) of patients with ARM. Gynecologic anomalies were present in 149 (39.1%) vs. 74 (16.3%) of subjects with vs. without VACTERL association (p < 0.001). VACTERL association did not significantly increase the risk of gynecologic anomaly in patients with cloaca and VACTERL (n = 88, 61.5%) vs. cloaca without VACTERL (n = 39, 54.2% p = 0.308). VACTERL association increased the risk of gynecologic anomalies in patients with rectoperineal fistulas (n = 7, 14.9% vs n = 9, 6.1% p = 0.014) and rectovestibular fistulas (n = 19, 31.1% vs. n = 13, 10.0% p<0.001). In patients with ARM who had a VACTERL association, when one of the associated anomalies was renal, there was an even higher risk of having an associated gynecologic anomaly (n = 138, 44.2% vs. n = 85, 16.3% p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: VACTERL association in patients with rectoperineal and rectovestibular fistulas correlates with an increased risk of gynecologic anomalies. The presence of VACTERL associated findings, especially renal, should prompt a thorough evaluation of the gynecologic system. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III. Retrospective comparative study.

Fecal continence disparities in patients with idiopathic constipation treated at referral institutions for pediatric colorectal surgery.

PURPOSE: Fecal continence is a concern for many patients with idiopathic constipation and can significantly impact quality of life. It is unknown whether racial, ethnic, and socioeconomic disparities are seen in fecal continence within the idiopathic constipation population. We aimed to evaluate fecal continence and associated demographic characteristics in children with idiopathic constipation referred for surgical evaluation. METHODS: A multicenter retrospective study of children with idiopathic constipation was performed at sites participating in the Pediatric Colorectal and Pelvic Learning Consortium (PCPLC). All patients >3y of age with idiopathic constipation diagnosis were included. The primary outcome was fecal continence, categorized as complete (no accidents ever), daytime (no accidents during the day), partial (occasional incontinence day/night), and none (incontinent). We evaluated for associations between fecal continence and race, sex, age, insurance status, and other patient-level factors, employing Kruskal-Wallis and trend tests. RESULTS: 458 patients with idiopathic constipation from 12 sites were included. The median age of diagnosis was 4.1 years. Only 25% of patients referred for surgical evaluation were completely continent. Age at the visit was significantly associated with fecal continence level (p = 0.002). In addition, patients with public and mixed public and private insurance had lower levels of continence (p<0.001). Patients with developmental delay were also more likely to have lower continence levels (p = 0.009) while diagnoses such as anxiety, ADD/ADHD, autism, depression, obsessive-compulsive disorder were not associated. Approximately 30% of patients had an ACE operation (antegrade continence enema) at a median age of 9.2 years at operation. Black patients were significantly less likely to undergo ACE operation (p = 0.016) when compared to white patients. CONCLUSION: We observed data that suggest differences in fecal incontinence rates based on payor status. Further investigation is needed to characterize these potential areas of disparate care. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Impedance planimetry (EndoFLIP) assisted laparoscopic esophagomyotomy in pediatric population.

INTRODUCTION: Functional lumen imaging probe (EndoFLIP) is a diagnostic technology that assesses esophageal cross-sectional area via impedance planimetry during controlled volumetric distention. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the utility of EndoFLIP intraoperatively during laparoscopic esophagomyotomy. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study reviewing all patients undergoing EndoFLIP assisted laparoscopic esophagomyotomy for achalasia between January and December 2021 (n = 10). Twenty-two patients with achalasia that underwent traditional laparoscopic esophagomyotomy between July 2014 and September 2019 served as a comparison. Primary outcome evaluated was resolution of symptoms at discharge. Secondary outcomes included change in distensibility index (DI), operative time, length of stay, time to regular diet, and reinterventions. RESULTS: All patients managed with EndoFLIP assistance had resolution of dysphagia and postprandial vomiting following intervention. Mean change in DI was 5.32 mm2/mmHg with a myotomy length of 3.6 cm. Operative time was shorter in the EndoFLIP cohort (97 min versus 185 min, p = <0.001). Study patients did not undergo an antireflux operation. There was no difference in length of stay or time to soft diet between groups. All patients were discharged on postoperative day 1 tolerating a mechanical soft diet. No acid suppressive medications were prescribed during the observation period. One patient required dilation for recurrent symptoms and one required reoperation for mucosal leak. CONCLUSION: EndoFLIP assisted laparoscopic esophagomyotomy results in similar short-term outcomes to traditional surgical technique. EndoFLIP allows for focused myotomy length and a shorter operative time. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Hirschsprung disease outcomes.

Hirschsprung disease (HD) is a complex surgical and medical problem that appears to have varied health and social outcomes with the age and neurodevelopmental state of patients. In general, long-term outcomes are thought to be good for the majority of patients despite recognized problems with constipation and/or fecal incontinence. However, there are no universally accepted pathways regarding post-operative bowel management programs nor clearly defined follow-up pathways making the current outcome measures difficult to interpret. Further, other factors that may influence outcome including age at the time of procedure and procedure type continue to lack consensus. Improved support of children in resource limited environments and during periods of transition into the adult medical care environment are needed to improve outcome.  Recent proliferation of multidisciplinary care teams and consortia may help to better understand outcomes and address current knowledge gaps. Continuing these collaborations will be imperative to continuing improvements in care which may ultimately impact outcome.

The presence of a neurodiverse disorder is associated with increased use of antegrade enema therapy in children with severe constipation: A study from the Pediatric Colorectal and Pelvic Learning Consortium (PCPLC).

INTRODUCTION: Children with severe constipation and a neurodiverse disorder (Autism and/or developmental delay) represent a challenging bowel management group. Treatment outcomes with laxative or enema therapy remain limited and are often complicated by patient/caregiver compliance. We hypothesized that children with neurodiverse disorders and severe constipation would benefit from a bowel management program (BMP) that includes early use of antegrade enemas. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Children requiring BMP in the Pediatric Colorectal and Pelvic Learning Consortium (PCPLC) registry with diagnosis of constipation and/or constipation with pseudo-incontinence were reviewed. Those with Hirschsprung disease and/or Anorectal Malformation were excluded. BMP needs in patients with a neurodiverse diagnosis were compared to those without to evaluate differences in BMP's. RESULTS: 372 patients requiring a BMP were identified. 95 patients (58 autism spectrum, 54 developmental delay) were neurodiverse, and 277 patients were not. Neurodiverse patients had a higher prevalence of enema therapy 62.1% (59/95) vs. 54.9% (152/273) and use of antegrade enema therapy 33.7% (32/95) vs. 21.2% (58/273), p = 0.126. Neurodiverse patients were older 37.9% (36/95) > 12 years vs. 23.1% (63/273), p = 0.001 and 47.6% (10/21) were changed from laxative to enema therapy over time. 80% (8/10) of those changed from laxatives to enemas used antegrade therapy. 67.3% (35/52) of neurodiverse patients followed over time were on enema therapy at the most recent visit with 80% (28/35) requiring antegrade therapy. CONCLUSION: A large portion of patients with a neurodiverse disorder who fail laxative therapy use antegrade enemas to achieve effective bowel management. Early consideration of an antegrade conduit may simplify treatment in this group of children. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Characterizing the use of botulinum toxin in patients with Hirschsprung disease treated at referral institutions for pediatric colorectal surgery.

PURPOSE: Botulinum toxin (BT) is used to treat pediatric patients with Hirschsprung disease (HD) with obstructive symptoms. We aimed to characterize use of BT in HD patients across pediatric colorectal surgery referral centers. METHODS: A multicenter retrospective study of BT use in children (0-18y) with HD was performed using the Pediatric Colorectal and Pelvic Learning Consortium (PCPLC) between 2017 and 2021. Sites with <10 HD patients recorded were excluded. Patterns were evaluated using Fisher's exact, Wilcoxon rank-sum, Kruskal-Wallis, and Cochran-Armitage trend test. RESULTS: 494 patients at 8 centers were included. 118 (23.9%) received at least one BT injection. Among patients who required redo pullthrough procedures, 53.1% received BT compared to 22.7% of patients who only underwent one pullthrough (p<0.001). Age at pullthrough was also significantly associated (p = 0.021). A lower proportion of Hispanic patients received BT (9.6% vs. 26.3%;p = 0.006). Percentage of HD patients receiving BT varied significantly across sites (p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Use of BT in patients with HD varies widely with greater use in patients who underwent redo surgery and in those who underwent pullthrough at an older age. Hispanic patients received less BT. These findings highlight the need to develop consensus guidelines and for further study on timing of injections and potential disparities in care. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Urinary continence disparities in patients with anorectal malformations.

PURPOSE: While fecal incontinence is a primary concern for many children with anorectal malformations (ARM), urinary incontinence is also prevalent in this population. Racial, ethnic, and socioeconomic disparities in urinary continence have been observed in other conditions, but have not been previously evaluated in ARM. We aimed to evaluate urinary continence and associated demographic and socioeconomic characteristics in individuals with ARM. METHODS: We performed a multicenter retrospective study of ARM patients evaluated at sites participating in the Pediatric Colorectal and Pelvic Learning Consortium (PCPLC).  We included all patients with ARM 3 years and older. The primary outcome was urinary continence which was categorized as complete (no accidents), daytime (accidents at night), partial (rare or occasional accidents), and none (frequent accidents or no continence). We evaluated for associations between urinary continence and race, sex, age, insurance status, and adoption status, employing Kruskal-Wallis and trend tests. Secondary outcomes included bladder management strategies such as clean intermittent catheterization and continence surgery. P-value < 0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: A total of 525 patients with ARM were included. Overall, 48% reported complete urinary continence, and continence was associated with greater age. For school-aged children (age ≥ 5 years), 58% reported complete continence, while 30% reported none. Public insurance and adoption status were associated with decreased likelihood of incontinence. CONCLUSIONS: We observed a novel finding of disparities in urinary continence for children with ARM related to insurance and adoption status. Further investigation regarding the etiologies of these inequities is needed in order to affect clinical outcomes.

Mucous Fistula Refeeding Promotes Earlier Enteral Autonomy in Infants With Small Bowel Resection.

OBJECTIVE: Infants requiring intestinal resection because of necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) or small bowel atresia (SBA) may benefit from mucous fistula refeeding (MFR) of enterostomy output to improve nutrition and bowel adaptation before reanastomosis. Previous series demonstrated improved outcomes with MFR but did not account for varied patient characteristics as potential sources of bias. We performed a cohort analysis using multivariable adjusted models to compare outcomes of patients with and without MFR. METHODS: Retrospective chart review was performed for patients with NEC or SBA and small bowel resection with enterostomy and MF. Demographic and outcome data was compared between MFR and non-MFR groups using adjusted multivariable analysis for potential confounding variables. RESULTS: MFR was performed in 65 of 101 patients (64%), including 45 of 75 patients with NEC and 20 of 26 patients with SBA. Reasons for not receiving MFR included bowel stricture, technical limitation, or not otherwise specified. NEC patients receiving MFR had 14 fewer days to achieve full enteral feeds after intestinal reconnection, 22 fewer days of parenteral nutrition, lower peak direct bilirubin by 2.4 mg/dL, and 77% less odds of ursodiol use (all P < 0.01). SBA patients had similar trends not reaching statistical significance. Growth parameters were improved in MFR groups. There were no complications or increased infections from MFR. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that MFR safely improves nutritional outcomes in infants with intestinal resection, related to decreased total parenteral nutrition (TPN) dependence and earlier enteral autonomy.

30-day postoperative outcomes of neonatal versus delayed anoplasty for perineal and vestibular fistulas.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare the postoperative outcomes of neonatal versus delayed repair of rectoperineal and rectovestibular fistulae using a multi-center pediatric colorectal specific database. We hypothesized that the incidence of 30-day postoperative complications is not significantly different between these two surgical treatment strategies. METHODS: We performed a retrospective, observational study of the Pediatric Colorectal and Pelvic Learning Consortium (PCPLC) database. We included any patient from the database that underwent primary surgical repair of a rectoperineal or rectovestibular fistula. Neonatal repair was defined as occurring within 14 days of birth, and delayed repair as occurring after that period. The primary outcome was the occurrence of postoperative complications within 30 days. RESULTS: 164 patients were included in the study (123 rectoperineal, 41 rectovestibular); the majority (81%) were repaired in a delayed fashion. Patients that underwent delayed repair had lower birth weights and were more likely to be female than those that underwent neonatal repair. Wound breakdown/dehiscence was the most common complication in both groups (Delayed 5.3% v. Neonatal, 6.5%). We found no significant difference in the incidence of any postoperative complication between groups (Delayed 6.0 v. Neonatal 6.5%, p = 1.0). CONCLUSION: We concluded there was no significant difference in the incidence of 30-day postoperative complications for neonatal versus delayed repair of rectoperineal and rectovestibular fistulae, suggesting that both strategies are safe and may have excellent short-term outcomes in appropriately selected patients.

Perioperative and long-term functional outcomes of neonatal versus delayed primary endorectal pull-through for children with Hirschsprung disease: A pediatric colorectal and pelvic learning consortium study.

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: the timing of endorectal pull-through for Hirschsprung disease (HD) is controversial. Neonatal primary endorectal pull-through theoretically prevents preoperative enterocolitis. Delayed primary endorectal pull-through offers the surgeon the benefit of more robust perineal anatomy and allows primary caregivers the time to emotionally process the diagnosis and to gain experience with rectal irrigations. We hypothesized that delayed primary endorectal pull-through would be associated with equivalent perioperative morbidity compared to the neonatal repair and would lead to improved long-term functional outcomes. METHODS: we analyzed all patients in the Pediatric Colorectal and Pelvic Learning Consortium (PCPLC) registry who had a primary endorectal pull-through for HD and at least three-and-one-half years of follow up in a specialty colorectal clinic. We evaluated patient demographics, operative outcomes, perioperative episodes of enterocolitis, and long-term functional outcomes for the neonatal (<31 days) and delayed (≥31 days) pull-through cohorts. RESULTS: eighty-two patients were identified of whom 49 were operated upon in the neonatal period and 33 in a delayed fashion. The median age at operation was 11 days [IQR 7 - 19 days] for the neonatal cohort and 98 days [IQR 61 - 188 days] for the delayed cohort. Thirty-four (69.4%) of the neonatal and 22 (66.7%) of the delayed cohort patients had rectosigmoid transition zones. Four of 49 patients (8.1%) in the neonatal cohort were diagnosed with enterocolitis preoperatively compared to two of 33 (6.0%) in the delayed cohort (p = 0.89). Eighteen of 49 patients (36.7%) in the neonatal cohort and 16 of 33 (48.5%) in the delayed cohort had at least one postoperative episode of enterocolitis (p = 0.38). Fifteen of 49 patients (30.6%) in the neonatal cohort were receiving bowel management for fecal incontinence at most recent follow up compared to five of 33 (15.2%) in the delayed cohort (p = 0.13). CONCLUSION: delayed primary endorectal pull-through offers a safe alternative to operation in the neonatal period and appears to have, at least, equivalent functional outcomes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective comparative study.

Comparison of Maternal Histories and Exposures in Children With Isolated Anorectal Malformation Versus Anorectal Malformation With Genitourinary Anomalies.

Introduction To our knowledge, there are no studies to date that have compared patients with isolated anorectal malformation (ARM) to patients with ARM and an associated genitourinary (GU) malformation despite a possible etiological difference between these two entities. We examined the differences in maternal and prenatal exposures and comorbidities between patients with isolated ARM and patients with ARM and associated GU malformations. Materials and methods A retrospective cohort study of children with ARM, enrolled in the Pediatric Colorectal and Pelvic Learning Consortium (PCPLC) between February 2017 and October 2019, was performed comparing those with isolated ARM to those with ARM and associated GU anomalies (GU +/- additional anomalies) as well as to those with ARM and a GU anomaly with no anomaly of any other system (GU-only). We compared the prevalence of prematurity, family history of colorectal disorders, as well as maternal and prenatal comorbidities and exposures between these two cohorts and the isolated ARM cohort. Results A total of 505 patients (117 with isolated ARM and 388 with ARM and associated GU anomalies) were enrolled. Of the 388 patients with ARM and associated GU anomalies, 48 had an ARM with a GU anomaly without an anomaly in any other system. There was an increased prevalence of premature births in the GU +/- additional anomalies cohort compared to the isolated ARM cohort (27 vs 14%, p=0.003). This difference was not seen in the GU-only cohort. There was no difference between the cohorts regarding prevalence of family history of ARM or maternal and prenatal comorbidities or exposures. Conclusions Patients with an ARM and an associated GU anomaly with or without other congenital anomalies are more likely to be born prematurely compared to patients with an isolated ARM. Parents of these children should be counseled on this increased risk.

Multi-institutional review of bowel management strategies in children with anorectal malformations.

BACKGROUND/RATIONALE: To describe current bowel management program (BMP) strategies in anorectal malformation (ARM) patients based on patient-level predictors using data from a multi-institutional consortium. MATERIALS/METHODS: Patient bowel function and BMP were reviewed from Pediatric Colorectal and Pelvic Learning Consortium (PCPLC) data. The PCPLC is comprised of multidisciplinary specialists researching colorectal and pelvic disorders. Seven US institutions submitted de-identified clinical data on ARM patients into a centralized patient registry. RESULTS: The primary ARM of 624 patients was categorized into Mild (45.2%), Moderate (40.4%) or Complex (14.2%) anomaly classifications. Patient-specific BMP were examined based on age and on the presence of spinal cord/sacral anomalies. 418 (67%) enrolled patients were prescribed BMP (<5 yo 56.4%; ≥5-<12 yo 86.7%; ≥12 81.5%). Constipation was the primary chief complaint (80.2%). Forty percent of patients on a BMP were toilet trained and approximately one-half (48.5%) reported daytime stool accidents. Secondary surgical interventions for antegrade continence enemas (ACE) were examined; 14.5% of patients employed ACE strategies and utilization increased with age and varied based on anatomic anomalies. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first report on BMP strategies for patients with ARM from the Pediatric Colorectal and Pelvic Learning Consortium. Individual patient characteristics are explored for their impact on bowel management strategy utilization. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Guidelines for synoptic reporting of surgery and pathology in Hirschsprung disease.

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: Synoptic, or standardized, reporting of surgery and pathology reports has been widely adopted in surgical oncology. Patients with Hirschsprung disease may experience morbidity related to surgical factors or underlying pathology and often undergo multiple operations. Our aim is to improve the postoperative outcome and care of patients with Hirschsprung disease by proposing a standardized set of data that should be included in every surgery and pathology report. METHODS: Members of the American Pediatric Surgical Association Hirschsprung Disease Interest Group and experts in pediatric pathology of Hirschsprung disease participated in group discussions, performed literature review and arrived at expert consensus guidelines for surgery and pathology reporting. RESULTS: The importance of accurate operative and pathologic reports and the implications of inadequate documentation in patients with Hirschsprung disease are discussed and guidelines for standardizing these reports are provided. CONCLUSIONS: Adherence to the principles of reporting for operations and surgical pathology may improve outcomes for Hirschsprung disease patients and will facilitate identification of correlations among morphology, function, genetics and outcomes, which are required to improve the overall management of these patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: V.